advertising network: A service where ads are bought centrally through one company, and displayed on multiple Web sites that contract with that company for a share of revenue generated by ads served on their site.
algorithm: The technology that a search engine uses to deliver results to a query. Search engines utilize several algorithms in tandem to deliver a page of search results or keyword-targeted search ads.
anchor text: The clickable text part of a hyperlink. The text usually gives visitors or search engines important information on what the page being linked to is about.
click through rate (CTR): The rate (expressed in a percentage) at which users click on an ad. This is calculated by dividing the total number of clicks by the total number of ad impressions. CTR is an important metric for Internet marketers to measure the performance of an ad campaign.
content network: A group of Web sites that agree to show ads on their site, served by an ad network, in exchange for a share of the revenue generated by those ads. For example: Google AdSense or the Yahoo Publisher Network.
contextual advertising: Advertising that is targeted to a Web page based on the page's content, keywords, or category. Ads in most content networks are targeted contextually.
cost per action (CPA): A form of advertising where payment is dependent upon an action that a user performs as a result of the ad. The action could be making a purchase, signing up for a newsletter, or asking for a follow-up call. An advertiser pays a set fee to the publisher based on the number of visitors who take action. Many affiliate programs use the CPA model.
cost per click (CPC): Also called Pay per Click (PPC). A performance-based advertising model where the advertiser pays a set fee for every click on an ad. The majority of text ads sold by search engines are billed under the CPC model.
cost per thousand (CPM): An ad model that charges advertisers every time an ad is displayed to a user, whether the user clicks on the ad or not. The fee is based on every 1,000 ad impressions (M is the Roman numeral for 1,000). Most display ads, such as banner ads, are sold by CPM.
geo-targeting: Delivery of ads specific to the geographic location of the searcher. Geo-targeting allows the advertiser to specify where ads will or won't be shown based on the searcher's location, enabling more localized and personalized results.
Googlebot: Google uses several user-agents to crawl and index content in the Google.com search engine. Googlebot describes all Google spiders. All Google bots begin with "Googlebot"; for example, Googlebot-Mobile: crawls pages for Google’s mobile index; Googlebot-Image: crawls pages for Google’s image index.
inbound link: An inbound link is an hyperlink to a particular Web page from an outside site, bringing traffic to that Web page. Inbound links are an important element that most search engine algorithms use to measure the popularity of a Web page.
invisible web: A term that refers to the vast amount of information on the web that isn't indexed by search engines. Coined in 1994 by Dr. Jill Ellsworth.
keyword: A word or phrase entered into a search engine in an effort to get the search engine to return matching and relevant results. Many Web sites offer advertising targeted by keywords, so an ad will only show when a specific keyword is entered.
link bait: Editorial content, often sensational in nature, posted on a Web page and submitted to social media sites in hopes of building inbound links from other sites. Or, as Matt Cutts of Google says, "something interesting enough to catch people's attention."
link building: The process of getting quality Web sites to link to your Web site, in order to improve search engine rankings. Link building techniques can include buying links, reciprocal linking, or entering barter arrangements.
meta tags: Information placed in the HTML header of a Web page, providing information that is not visible to browsers, but can be used in varying degrees by search engines to index a page. Common meta tags used in search engine marketing are title, description, and keyword tags.
pay per click (PPC): See Cost per Click (CPC).
quality score: A score assigned by search engines that is calculated by measuring an ad's clickthrough rate, analyzing the relevance of the landing page, and considering other factors used to determine the quality of a site and reward those of higher quality with top placement and lower bid requirements. Some factors that make up a quality score are historical keyword performance, the quality of an ad's landing page, and other undisclosed attributes. All of the major search engines now use some form of quality score in their search ad algorithm.
return on investment (ROI): The amount of money an advertiser earns from their ads compared to the amount of money the advertiser spends on their ads.
search advertising: Also called Paid Search. An advertiser bids for the chance to have their ad display when a user searches for a given keyword. These are usually text ads, which are displayed above or to the right of the algorithmic (organic) search results. Most search ads are sold by the PPC model, where the advertiser pays only when the user clicks on the ad or text link.
search engine marketing (SEM): The process of building and marketing a site with the goal of improving its position in search engine results. SEM includes both search engine optimization (SEO) and search advertising, or paid search.
search engine optimization (SEO): The process of making a site and its content highly relevant for both search engines and searchers. SEO includes technical tasks to make it easier for search engines to find and index a site for the appropriate keywords, as well as marketing-focused tasks to make a site more appealing to users. Successful search marketing helps a site gain top positioning for relevant words and phrases.
search engine results pages (SERPs): The page searchers see after they've entered their query into the search box. This page lists several Web pages related to the searcher's query, sorted by relevance. Increasingly, search engines are returning blended search results, which include images, videos, and results from specialty databases on their SERPs.
social media: A category of sites that is based on user participation and user-generated content. They include social networking sites like LinkedIn or Facebook, social bookmarking sites like Del.icio.us, social news sites like Digg or Reddit, and other sites that are centered on user interaction.
spider: A search engine spider is a program that crawls the Web, visiting Web pages to collect information to add to or update a search engine's index. The major search engines on the Web all have such a program, which is also known as a "crawler" or a "bot."
title tag: An HTML meta tag with text describing a specific Web page. The title tag should contain strategic keywords for the page, since many search engines pay special attention to the title text when indexing pages. The title tag should also make sense to humans, since it is usually the text link to the page displayed in search engine results.
universal search: Also known as blended, or federated search results, universal search pulls data from multiple databases to display on the same page. Results can include images, videos, and results from specialty databases like maps and local information, product information, or news stories.
Web 2.0: A term that refers to a supposed second generation of Internet-based services. These usually include tools that let people collaborate and share information online, such as social networking sites, wikis, communication tools, and folksonomies.
Comments [0]
Subject: Inexperienced Chili Taster
Notes from an inexperienced chili taster named Frank, who was visiting Texas from the East Coast.
“Recently I was honored to be selected as a judge at a chili cook-off. The original person called in sick at the last moment, and I happened to be standing there at the judge’s table asking directions to the beer wagon when the call came. I was assured by the other two judges (Native Texans) that the chili wouldn’t be all that spicy, and besides, they told me I could have free beer during the tasting, so I accepted.
Here are the scorecards from the event…
Chili #1: Mike’s Maniac Mobster Monster Chili
Judge One: “A little too heavy on tomato. Amusing kick.
Judge Two: “Nice, smooth tomato flavor. Very mild.
Frank: “Holy shit, what the hell is this stuff? You could remove drived
paint from your driveway. Took me two beers to put the flames
out. I hope that’s the worst one. These Texans are crazy.
Chili #2: Arthur’s Afterburner Chili
Judge One: “Smoky, with a hint of pork. Slight Jalapeno tang.
Judge Two: Exciting BBQ flavor, needs more peppers to be taken seriously.
Frank: “Keep this out of reach of children! I’m not sure what I am supposed
to taste besides pain. I had to wave off two people who wanted
to give me the Heimlich maneuver. They had to rush in more
beer when they saw the look on my face.
Chili #3: Fred’s Famous Burn Down the Barn Chili
Judge One: “Excellent firehouse chili! Great kick. Needs more beans.”
Judge Two: “A beanless chili, a bit salty, good use of red peppers.”
Frank: “Call the EPA. I’ve located a uranium spill. My nose feel like I
have been snorting Drano. Everyone knows the routine by
now, get me more beer before I ignite. Barmaid pounded
me on the back; now my backbone is in the front part of
my chest. I’m getting shit-faced from all the beer.
Chili #4: Bubba’s Black Magic
Judge One: “Black bean chili with almost no spice. Disappointing.”
Judge Two: “Hint of lime in the black beans. Good side dish for fish
or other mild foods, not much of a chili.”
Frank: “I felt something scraping across my tongue, but was unable to taste it, is it possible to burn-out taste buds? Sally, the bar maid, was standing behind me with fresh refills;That 300 lb. bitch is starting to look HOT, just like this nuclear-waste I’m eating. Is chili an aphrodisiac?”
Chili #5: Linda’s Legal Lip Remover
Judge One: “Meaty, strong chili. Cayenne peppers freshly ground,
adding considerable kick. Very impressive.”
Judge Two: “Chili using shredded beef; could use more tomato. Must admit the cayenne peppers make a strong statement.”
Frank: “My ears are ringing, sweat is pouring off my forehead and I can no longer focus my eyes. I farted and four people behind me needed paramedics. The contestant seemed offended when I told her chili had give me brain damage. Sally saved my tongue from bleeding by pouring beer directly on it from a pitcher. I wonder if I’m burning my lips off? It really pisses me off that the other judges asked me to stop screaming. Screw those rednecks!
Chili #6: Vera’s Vegetarian Variety
Judge One: “Thin yet bold vegetarian variety chili. Good balance of spice and peppers.”
Judge Two: “The best yet. Aggressive use of peppers, onions and garlic. Superb.”
Frank: “My intestines are now a straight pipe filled with gaseous, sulfuric inferno flames. I pooped myself when I farted and I’m worried it will eat through the chair. No one seems inclined to stand behind me except that slut Sally, she must be kinkier than I thought. Can’t feel my lips anymore. I need to wipe my butt with a snow cone!”
Chili #7: Susan’s Screaming Sensation Chili
Judge One: “A mediocre chili with too much reliance on canned peppers.”
Judge Two: “Ho Hum, tastes as if the chef literally threw in a can of chili peppers at the last moment. I should note that I am worried about Judge Number 3. He appears to be in a bit of distress as he is cursing uncontrollably.”
Frank: “You could put a grenade in my mouth, pull the pin and I wouldn’t feel a damn thing. I’ve lost the sight in one eye, and the world sounds like it is made of rushing water. My shirt is covered with chili, which slid unnoticed out of my mouth. My pants are full of lava-like poop to match my damn shirt. At least during the autopsy they’ll know what killed me. I’ve decided to stop breathing, it’s too painful. Screw it, I’m not getting any oxygen anyway. If I need air, I’ll just suck it in through the 4 inch hole in my stomach.”
Chili #8: Helen’s Mount Saint Chili
Judge One: “A perfect ending, this is a nice blend chili, safe for all, not too bold but spicy enough to declare its existence.”
Judge Two: “This final entry is a good, balanced chili, neither mild nor hot. Sorry to see that most of it was lost when Judge Number 3 passed out, fell over and pulled the chili pot down on top of himself. Not sure if he’s going to make it. Poor Frank, wonder how he would have reacted to a really hot chili?”
Frank: unable to report….
_______________________________________
Comments [0]
Here we are ladies and gentlemen, the day of reckoning, not only for Google, which is releasing its Q1 earnings report today, but also for every tech company, search company and the entire stock market. All eyes are on America’s newest blue chip, Google, and their earnings from Q1 2009. Will Google earnings slow? Will Google show earnings? Will Google surprise the world with growth? Various analysts are picking Google to falter, and a handful picking Google to shock the world. Here’s my take. One year ago Google was a big spending tech giant, gobbling up every startup in its path with its surplus of billions of dollars of cash, and integrating those companies into the Google model. Some of those companies became key parts of Google, such as Keyhole, which is now Google Earth & Google Maps. Other acquisitions, well, they just didn’t work out as planned. I believe that we’ll see that Google’s cut backs in employment and unprofitable projects grouped with internal and external expansion of their Google AdWords advertising network will show growth in Q1 2009 for GOOG, especially with their calculated rollout of Adwords in Image Search & Google News, two of their top 10 Google Properties which were previously not serving advertising.Google Q1 Earnings : Expanding Google AdWords Network will Save GOOG
April 16th, 2009 by Loren Baker, Editor | 1 Comment
In January of this year, the second week of this quarter, Google started trimming the fat and getting rid of the products which it had launched or acquired which were not used, not profitable, and not representing a proactive direction at Google. These products include Google Catalog Search which Google used for exploring OCR technology ages ago and which it obviously doesn’t need now, Google Video Upload which has long been dead, Dodgeball, Mashup Editor end Jaiku, which was being touted before as a Twitter killer and Google Notebook.
In addition to cutting some of its properties and projects, Google also cut back on recruiting and ended up saying goodbye to over 100 employees in a round of cuts and reorganization. Google had some of its engineers located in Austin, Texas; Trondheim, Norway; and Lulea, Sweden to move to other Google Offices while they ended contracts with vendors and external contractors who were providing recruiting services for Google. The company also reduced its manpower base in its recruitment organization to around 100 positions. It was also reported that some engineers were being laid off in a round of reshuffling.
Is all of this negative? No, not really. Not at a time when most of the large employers in the United States are laying off thousands, Yahoo had to cut its workforce substantially and 1.4 million layoffs in the US last year. In comparison, layoffs at Google are quite minimal.
Now that we’ve gotten the layoffs and cuts out of the way, let’s look at ways that Google has grown in Q1 2009. I for one believe that Google takes a proactive and planned approach to all of its announcements and product launches. I tend to think of Google decisions as a “choose you own adventure book”, if Plan A does not work for Google, they have already put together a Plan B which will work. Instead of retreating and regrouping, Google is the kind of company which seems to not only have an exit strategy, but a success strategy as well. Let’s take Google advertising for example.
On the whole, search advertising spending may be down in 2009, but Google advertising via Adwords is designed to not only be cost effective for the advertiser, but also to scale.
Let’s look at Google’s most popular properties. After looking at Google’s top three properties in Google Search, GMail and Youtube; Google also has Google Image Search as its fourth most popular property, Google News as number six, and then Google Finance is slowly creeping up the charts too.
While Google was working on cutting back on its less profitable and unused properties, over the past quarter Google has been beefing up Image Search, News and Finance with changes to their image search results and image sorting, adding hosted AP news to Google News, and tweaking Google Finance.
You know what else they have done with these properties? Google added ADVERTISING to Image Search, Google News and Google Finance :
Notice a trend here? Google held back on serving AdWords advertising on 2 of their top most popular properties and on Google Finance until Q1 2009. Talk about keeping an Ace card in your back pocket!
There are two reasons why Google waited to integrate advertising into these properties - because they didn’t need it before AND because they knew that if Google ever had a rainy day, slapping ads within Image Search, Google News AND Google Finance (along with Google Picassa) would expand their advertising network in a controlled setting where Google keeps 100% of the ad revenue and also secure the company if hard times were on the horizon.
With the rest of the economy bailing out, Google grew its advertising network in 2009 with these strategic moves.
Looking at Q4 2008 Google earnings, their ad revenue grew a only a little over Q3 2008 :
In my opinion, I don’t think Google wanted to see this happen again, so they expanded internally and also externally, placing more ads on the most popular properties within Google and expanding their external distribution network. Add that with running the company more efficiently and also cutting back on the projects which were going no where, and I’m expecting some surprises from Google today on earnings.
What are your thoughts?
Comments [0]
Date: April 10, 2009 3:04:01 PM GMT-04:00Subject: How Social Media Changes Ad CampaignsSource: Social Media NewsAuthor: Nick GonzalezAs you should all know, we’re holding a Social Media Boot Camp in Chicago next week (We’re holding another in New York in May). As part of the event, I’ve been polishing a presentation on Social Media Marketing Principles that will lead the audience through how social media changes their marketing campaigns.
All too often, social media is held up as something intimidating and revolutionary. My goal is to show that social media can have an evolutionary impact on marketers advertising campaigns. It I were to boil the presentation down to one phrase it would be that “social media adds new tools and a new approach to make marketing better”.
If I were to boil it down to one slide, it would be the one below. Social media adds a new set of features to marketing creative, new channels to distribution, and new metrics to our analysis of campaigns.
Pepsi’s “refresh everything” campaign (featured in the slide) is a great example of an ad campaign that bridged the gap between traditional and social media. Other campaigns go further into social media (TurboTax), but the Pepsi campaign is less intimidating. To get out the word, Pepsi used the traditional battery of print and television advertising. However, the campaign also leveraged a video campaignchallenging users to submit their own note to the newly elected President Obama.
Comments [0]
I capture periods of my life with mixes. I have done it since I was 12. A lot of people do. Dust off the cassettes and burned CD's and throw in one of your mixes. Instantly, you are flooded with memories of everything that was going on when you made it. At least thats the case for me. Ocassionally, I throw one into the public domain ---
Comments [0]
Date: March 9, 2009 2:59:37 PM GMT-04:00Subject: Social networking and blogs now more popular than emailSource: Social Media NewsAuthor: Nick GonzalezIt wasn’t too long ago that social networking was more popular than porn. Now it appears they, along with blogs, have overtaken that perpetual necessity, email.
A Nielsen Online report says two thirds of us now use what it calls “Member Communities,” which includes both social networks and blogs. MCs now make up “the fourth most popular category online – ahead of personal email,” says Nielsen Online. The others are search, portals, and PC software.
Nielsen Online says:
Facebook - the world’s most popular social network - is visited monthly by three in every 10 people online across the nine markets in which Nielsen tracks social networking use. Facebook has its greatest reach in the UK market 47%. Orkut in Brazil has the largest domestic online reach 70% of any social network in these markets.
The use of MCs grew by more than 10% in the UK last year, but Brazil has the highest penetration see chart. Nielsen Online says:
Among the markets Nielsen measured, penetration of visits to social networks and blogs was highest in Brazil, where 80% of the online audience visits such sites. The share of overall Internet time for which social networks and blogs account is also highest in Brazil, where nearly one in four 23% of minutes spent online is spent on these sites. Following Brazil was the UK, where over one in six minutes 17% is spent on these sites.
via Social networking and blogs now more popular than email, says Nielsen | Technology | guardian.co.uk.
www.3d8wz.th8.us)" style="text-decoration: none; ">
Tweet This
Comments [0]
Comments [0]